Why does India not speak infront of ?

As yesterday I was reading one article from "OutLookindia.com" stating the line "We have put Pakistan On Notice" in the subject line noticing the event of PM's address at the Combined Commander's Conference.
The subjectivity of the subject for which Manmohan Singh ji was addressing was looking somehow distracted or there was some overlapping of linguistics of speech to the Bush’s word. Rhetoric can be ignored as all ‘aalla afsar’ pass-out of Cambridge Univ. or equivalent. But if some one is talking about nation’s interest; it simply can’t be ignored.
Let’s put the statements:
‘We face a world of unprecedented economic opportunities and, at the same time, unprecedented political dangers. To navigate our way through these, calls for statecraft of the highest order.’

Discuss controversial SEZ policies and of course about the political dangers: does that mean for the for the formation of allied government for so many years in lack of clear verdict and also danger of no anarchy /reelection as no power given to president of India to run states.
Where are the public interests/reservation issue/ Delhi ceiling issue/ recent Mumbai blast/ and finally Mohammad afzal hanging issue.


International terrorism is the principle challenge today to plural and democratic societies. It not only destroys human life and property but also endangers democratic values,social harmony and economic well being.

Cruel