What is a screen play

Go to link

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screenplay

What's eating Gilbert Grape

I dont know what I saw in the movie, it was complex. Simplest character was of Arnie's as he was flowing like a mad river here and there. But in a great control. May be Leonardo was actually talented boy at that time as well. But surely  Johnny's character was even more complex that why he let things away always from his hands. Lack of authoritative hand. He acted in the character brilliantly. Johnny was the central character, whose affinity towards his brother and family was very well shown in the movie. But strength in his role came after when  Becky ( Juliette Lewis ) came into different frames. Which let him think little about himself. That was the interesting part for the change which was coming into his character.
Sometimes I surprised that what sort of societies are they, which creates a different origin for writers who dealt with such stories and imagine such characters.
During the play sometimes I thought that I should not complete the movie because a sad yet happy ending was expected but not like this. In India it is almost impossible to fabricate characters and stories on such dimentions.
And also it depends if people are going to like such movies or not, which is a subject of great debate. Because in our part of society when does it happen like this?

I would surely be able to say one can watch this movie but not if not so then he had not miss anything.

After Maharashtra Vidhansabha fiasco, who got what?

Newspapers : Front Page news for a day and ofcourse the redmarked photo for the Abu Azmi saab.

News Channels: Whole day intellectual or non- intellectual engagements to show related to the incident.

Congress-NCP alliance: Another chance to weaken the MNS, Shiv Sena hold ( atleast in nagarpalika )in Maharashtra by projecting as this issue at the core of big blunder.

BJP: Nothing but a chance to stifle their own mistakes, ideology and to show sympathy with the victim ……….. (Fill in the blank) Abu Azmi Saab. Also in my opinion they should not have any alliance with a weak party like Shiv Sena.

Samajwadi Party : For them nothing exists out of Uttar Pradesh, But they can ban Maharashtrians in Uttarpradesh, when Mulayam would be in UP government next time after Mayavati. Also they can make some sort of propaganda to hurt Marathis in Mumbai or related areas ( Its hypothetical completely, If it takes place, then don’t blame me ). Or also they can educate people about the falsehood created by Raj thackrey.

MNS ( Maharashtra NavNirman Sena ): They are in limelight again. But for how much time? I guess until Marathi People don’t understand the actual value to Maharashtrian-pride.

Abu Azmi Saab : Another chance to learn Marathi.

Barkha Dutt : Topic to stop the Buck. I don’t know who many identities are going to be stopped by her. Actually today she asked one question to Abu Azmi saab that ,” Sir, Ab aap Marathi seekhenge ki nahi “. In reply to her he told him that “ Madam, Main Jaroor seekhonga, Marathi Meri Maa ki tarah hai, Lekin main apni Matra bhasha ka bhi apmaan nahi sehs sakta. Main Marathi seekhoonga , taki Maharashtra ke logo ki problem sahi se samajh sakoo, na ki raj thackrey jaise logo ke dar se, is galatfehmi main von na rahe” .

MTV: May be, they might found some thing on this as well to show something on Yungistan. In India they can connect to any political issue these days through their program.

NDTV : They don’t show news these days but try to opinioned people from the view of congress window. So congress’s view on this is their opinion as well as the news for them.

Aaj tak news channel :This channel has real potential to create an animated view of How Azmi Saab was beaten up in Vidhaan Sabha by MNS MLAs and give elongated version of the incident.

India TV new channel: Chance to show bullshit as always.

People of Maharashtra and India: They can have opinions like “ Ye Desh kha jar aha hai” , “ Jai Maharashtra” , “ Baat to sahi hai, Marathwada main Marathi nahi bolenge to kya bolenge” etc. etc.

Home Minister R R Patil : By change he completed his oath, otherwise I could not have chance to write about him assuming him as home minister. By the way he don’t do anything.

What is law? any thoughts??

How image works?

Complexity starts when image created inside our mind. Then we correlate it with imagination. But all senses decide over creation of image or imagination at the same time. And its very less time taking. Again if a sense is down then the otherone will help in creating an image or imagination. I mean if image are only captured through eyes then when it is not with human then other senses will help in creating imagination but still I think that area as unexplore for me atleast because Ihave never talked to a blind but definitly other senses must create a sense of imagination which should be completely different from any sort of imagery which we can imagination. Infact we can say in short that it is out of our language which is completely full of symbols again or again certain kind of images.But surely all these symbols or images captured in the memory over the period of time till you are able to see through eyes or feel through your other senses. So one can sense anything and which lead to individual talent to be imaginative. But one sense can supress the imagination of the the other. Very complex!!huh

Violence within the violent self.

Few days back I was just thinking about thinking, my thinking. Which allows me to think about a situation when I felt very violent about being violent of feeling the things around me. I felt, what is the need to go for job every day if I dont want to do the same everyday, but at the same time why to shit everyday as well or to eat everyday? How have we modulated or accommodated our self/myself to such an unwanted situation of following things in which I'm least interested into. And after that I felt that I should break everything coming into my way. I mean, not very violently but silently by improving upon the control schemes exists with in ourselves. Do we actually thing what we need actually or are we only fighting for survival?
I somehow feel, if education and our culture have played a crucial role in developing our perspective and behavior. I seriously noted few points on the behavior and style of life that we practice without any reason and cause. Like we don’t do anything on Sundays and Saturdays and why do we feel for not doing any thing on these days. No one knows, but it is habitual. It was written in our spiritual textbooks that one should wakeup early in the morning but how is it missing in urban people. More people are involved in political commentaries as they know everything about future and past of India and her inhabitants. Violence inflicted upon them if What are we replenishing continuously? Where do our interests lie? Do we believe in our action? And what I do?

Love, Aaj kal

Surrprise....It is ofcourse a movie from the time of Aaj Kal. I dont understand if Aaj Kal was used for our times or both but significantly the older part of movie was visibly eloquent . But today's part was hard to digest and the 'Khula Saand' phrase for Saif is rubbish to use. Couple was in relationship but I felt if they are biologically professional. Missing with dialogues. Even I feel the dialogues were quite random or week when value was given to individual people on the screen. The expressions by Harleen on some places were priceless. That reminds of the times in 50es if I want to be there to observe such a beauty and value to individual characters and their expressions. However, characters of Saif and Deepika were built along weak lines..ofcourse the one one from our times which was quite unrealistic to talk about at all. But how does movie performing in the market if it is not as good as the 'Jab We met'? So there could be possibility of No good Movie time zone recently and Saif/Deepika factor. However, one can watch this movie but can not remember; of course it is without any message.

Gandhi, Nehru, Gaffar Khan, Patel and Maulana Ajad

From left to right : Pandit jawahar lal nehru, Khan abdul gaffar khan, sardar vallabh bhai patel, Maulana Azad and Mohan das karamchand gandhi.

Jawahar lal Nehru's family

The family of Motilal Nehru, who is seated in the centre. Standing (L to R) Jawaharlal Nehru, Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit, Krishna Hutheesingh, Indira Gandhi and Ranjit Pandit; Seated: Swaroop Rani, Motilal Nehru and Kamala Nehru.

Black and White ( V1)

TiTle-Tree

U.S. President Harry Truman signs the bill ratifying the North Atlantic Treaty, part of creating the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/featured_documents/north_atlantic_treaty/

Question me: Third Front

Among the big casualties of the recent general elections was the “Third Front” which had been the centre- piece of the left’s political strategy to push the Congressinto a corner and cut the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) down to size. Unfortunately for its promoters, who pitched it as the electoral and policy alternative to the Congress and BJP at the national level, it was largely rejected by the voters and has now been accepted, by its very advocates, as a non-starter.
The reasons for this crushing defeat are not difficult to spot and have already been identified by the principal players them­selves. It was an ad hoc arrangement cobbled together under the initiative of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) [CPI(M)] after its bitter parting with the United Progressive Alliance gov­ernment over the nuclear deal in July last year. The primary binding factor of the constituents was opposition to the Congress. Yet this opposition to the Congress was of a contingent nature for most of them. Even though, ostensibly, they all were opposed to the BJP, they had, other than the left parties, often shared power with this “communal” party. Crucially, there was no coherence in the policy and ideological positions of its constituents. If the All- India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam had construction of the Ram temple and protection of Ram’s bridge (Sethusamudram) in its manifesto, the Telugu Desam Party had for long been the World Bank’s global poster boy for “economic reforms”. While the Telangana Rashtra Samiti’s (TRS) demand for a separate Telangana sat uneasy with its ally, CPI(M)’s insistence on a unified Andhra Pradesh, the Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam’s pitch for the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam’s Prabhakaran was equally at odds with the positions of other parties. Further, it was clear that each of its non-left constituents had kept their options of joining a BJP-led government open. Lastly, all the main third front con­stituents, including the CPI(M), faced significant erosion of popu­lar support due to their policies in government and were basing their chances of victory on the unpopularity or division of their opposition, rather than on any positive agenda of change.
Given this context, one is sorely tempted to repeat Marx’s oft-abused line that history repeats itself, first as tragedy and then as farce. The present, happily deceased, attempt at a third front government at the centre has a genealogy which stretches back to the post-Janata Party period when parties which represented regional economic and social interests came together against the domi­nance of the Congress. Their strength came from two social strata: one was the peasantry led by the dominant castes of each region and the other was the non-metropolitan urban popula­tions of professional middle classes, businessmen and industrial­ists. These social classes were in a struggle with the big industri­alists and metropolitan middle classes for political power and economic resources. This struggle expressed itself in a political agenda of federalism, democratic reforms and redistributive eco­nomic policies. It provided coherence and strength to their unity, gave them a radical edge and they, in turn, helped democratise Indian politics by breaking the dominance of the Congress. Their decade-long struggle for political power culminated in the defeat of the Congress in 1989 and the formation of a true third front govern­ment which was anti-Congress yet distant from the BJP.
This third front was repeated in the form of the United Front govern­ment of the mid-1990s, which, in hindsight, can be labelled a “tragedy”. Not only did it give a big push to neoliberal economic reforms, it paved the way, politically, for the emergence and con­solidation of the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government. The third front provided the personnel, training in running national coalitions of regional powers and political space for the expansion of the NDA. If that was a tragedy, the present attempt has surely been a “farce”.
It is not enough to merely dismiss the third front in such terms but is necessary to understand why it has come to such a pass. Today all the parties which potentially make up the third front, whether it be the Dravidian parties in Tamil Nadu, Deve Gowda in Karnataka, Telugu Desam and TRS in Andhra Pradesh, Nationalist Congress in Maharashtra, Biju Janata Dal in Orissa, Jharkhand Mukti Morcha in Jharkhand, Janata Dal (United) in Bihar and Bahujan Samaj Party or Samajwadi Party in Uttar Pradesh, have a distin­guished track record of opening their states to the most rapacious exploitation of humans and nature by capital while peddling var­ious forms of cultural and regional chauvinism to mobilise the masses. In this they are led by the rich peasants who are clamour­ing to commercialise agriculture and thus transform themselves into rural capitalists, and by industrialists in the states who have seen their capital grow exponentially under the policies of liberalisation, privatisation and globalisation and are now among the biggest champions of such economic “reforms”. In pursing this agenda, these social classes and their parties are natural al­lies of the Congress and BJP and, therefore, do not show any in­terest in bonding together like they did two decades ago. Where is the space, in this transformed agenda of the regional parties, for any form of radical or democratic politics?
The CPI(M), which has been the main proponent of the third front, should have very little in common with these policies of the third front parties. Unfortunately, in the recent past, its Bengal unit has shown a similar inclination, allowing special economic zones, dispossessing poor peasants for big industrialists and encourag­ing Bengali chauvinism to counter the Gorkhaland demand. It is crucial for the health of Indian democracy that the CPI(M) in particular and the left in general, dump this poisoned chalice and reaffirm their commitment to their own legacy of building mass movements on a radical transformative agenda.

The Civil War ends, but....

The death of Velupillai Prabhakaran signals the end of the civil war between the Sri Lankan government and the militant Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). For nearly three decades since its formation, the LTTE had relentlessly pur­sued its aim of achieving a separate state (Eelam) to be carved out of the northern and eastern areas of Sri Lanka. In the course of its single-minded drive to achieve “Eelam”, the organisation ruthlessly decimated other militant organisations and voices among the Tamils – many of whom were willing to accept autonomy or federal rights for the Tamils. But by accepting no com­promises and by continuing to use tactics such as assassination of perceived “enemies of the cause” and violent retribution, the LTTE brought about its own doom.
Despite a systematic shelling and bombing campaign that killed or incapacitated thousands of civilians, the Sri Lankan army did not receive anything more than token disapproval or humanitarian appeals from the international community. The Sri Lankan government’s ruthless drive to vanquish the “terrorist” LTTE was never halted in the final phase of war by an international community tired of “terror” – a stigma that the LTTE car­ried for its past actions. The LTTE’s own cynical moves to use Tamil civilians as a shield, a fact that was brushed aside by the organisation’s propagandists, only alienated them even further in the eyes of the international arbiters such as the United Nations or India. The events leading up to the end of the battle – with the Sri Lankan army’s capture of the last remaining areas of the Vanni region under LTTE control, and the killing of the outfit’s senior representatives and leaders – are murky. Questions remain about the way the LTTE leader and founder, Prabhakaran, his family members and the organisation’s political representatives were killed and war crimes by the Sri Lankan army cannot be ruled out. But the general lack of sympathy for the vanquished among the international community is itself a consequence of the LTTE’s intransigence in its ways and means.
Thousands of Tamil civilians now live in “appalling conditions”– as the visiting UN secretary general Ban Ki-moon called them – in internment camps after displacement because of the war. Despite claims by the Lankan government about commitment to “early resettlement”, its actions in restricting access to these camps by humanitarian agencies and its callous treatment of the displaced people in the camps in the name of security do not inspire confidence. These actions in tandem with the triumphalism dis­played by the Sri Lankan polity would only make one more scepti­cal about the Lankan government’s claims of bringing about a democratic solution to the problems of the Tamil minority after the defeat of the “terrorist” LTTE. A lasting peace after the defeat of the outfit would remain a chimera if the Sri Lankan polity refuses to acknowledge the plight of the displaced Vanni residents or indeed of the genuine grievances of the Tamil community.
The LTTE’s inflexibility and rejection of any compromise, say a federal solution to the conflict, its dwindling legitimacy internationally and the internal split, with the defection of erstwhile eastern commander, Vinayagamurthy Muralidharan, were ulti­mately responsible for its defeat. Several moments capture the cynical single-mindedness of the group. It rejected an offer from the ex-president Chandrika Kumaratunga, which provided powers of devolution even greater than what the Thirteenth Amendment in 1987 (that provided for provincial councils) envis­aged. After a ceasefire agreement in 2002, the LTTE signalled a willingness to discuss a federal solution, but backed out of peace talks for no valid reason. It also engaged in violent acts in viola­tion of the agreement (something which the Lankan government was also guilty of). It even called for a boycott of elections by the Tamils, an action that helped hardliner Mahinda Rajapaksa become the president of the country with the support of other Sinhala chauvinist parties and thus resulted later in the recently concluded violent phase of the civil war.
The intractable positions taken by the LTTE were partly due to the enthusiastic material and arms support that the organisation received through funding and donations from the Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora over the years. After the 11 September 2001 attacks in New York, the LTTE, which had been proscribed in 32 nations, found its material support drying up because of tough actions against its sympathisers in many countries where toler­ance for support to “terror” outfits became negligible.
Among the Tamil community in Sri Lanka and in the vast diaspora of Sri Lankan Tamils, there is a deep sense of despond­ency following the defeat of the LTTE. Many of the latter’s sympa­thisers are still in denial about the death of the outfit’s leader. These sympathizers should introspect about the reasons for the bloody end to the war between the Sri Lankan government and the LTTE. Far from realising the aspirations of the minority Tamils, who aimed for self-rule, the LTTE’s actions have only resulted in a traumatised Tamil population disaffected both by the “Eelam cause” and with the government ruling from Colombo.
There remains no excuse for the Sri Lankan government to avoid addressing the grievances of the Tamils now that the LTTE is vanquished. Anything short of a federal set-up that grants political rights for the oppressed Tamil population would only lead to a further festering of the deep wounds from years of mar­ginalisation and alienation of the Tamils. In the provision of relief to the displaced Tamils and in their resettlement, the international community, through its various humanitarian agencies, must play an important role. Also, the international community must be vigilant and should pressurise the Sri Lankan govern­ment to arrive at a political solution to the conflict that takes account of its root causes. In the absence of this, the seeds would be sown for another militant organisation – one that would have learnt from the past mistakes of the LTTE – espous­ing complete separation.

EPW

P

'84

Koshish

Kashmir Bacho

Kashmir

Ek Mazdoor

Feu||d||ture

"You" and "We"

The identification of subject is quite obvious these days for people living in Mumbai. Subject was very flammable and full of community hatred. Provoking words were raised to create an identity among masses , to create a foundation for lost identity,to create an influence over people and above all it was an attempt to create a dividing line. Dividing line with a background and a foreground based on ethnic foundation.
I have two things to say:
One is , there is not doubt that mumbai is fed up of people and she has become a collection these days. Due to that public sector services are getting worse day by day. Which is resulting in form of lesser healthy living environment. Also it is affecting the voting system because 60-70 % people are not from Mumbai or Maharashtrians. Marathi has lost its meaningful ground among the ghetto of these English, Hindi or other language speaking people. So the issue was valid but raised in a wrong tone or voice and with dirty intentions.
Secondly, the dust of community divide is quite allergic and it create a divide in certain communities. India is made from states but it has identity of her own which is created from diversified culture of each individual states. It is nonsense to propose a dividing line between between communities or states in the time of globalization across the boundaries of nation.

Two things are obtrusive to me. People used to took 'Marathi' word carefully in crowd and 'Thakre' surname comes with delirium in my mind.

I found it posting while I was in Goa this new year

I got this picture of a 10 year old boy serving tourists on Goa beach ( Anjuana ). I have no reason for putting this pic. on this blog but I found it interesting while I was in conversation with him. Her mother was looking at him from some distance in pic. You can see in the pic. And certainly she was trying to scrutinize his child's skills ( remotely control )of trading 'Maalas' to me.

Pakistan lost the headlines

Gujarat 2007

Eye on Gujarat

This is cruelty of Gujarat riots.

An unknown Resume

This one I got it from one boy working in my Office ,used to clean office floor. Although he was familiar to the induastrial terminology of 'Resume' but after introspecting, his pain was prevailed after I interviewed him.

Mantri Saab Ruko ( Please stop minister sir)

This is a paradigm of new age.

Band in oblivion

From some days I have been observing 'Ganesh Puja' as a state of celebration with placing a cacophony of localized Band played day and night next door to me. In certain time I have designed my faith in religion and its advertising elements in a way to satisfy my logical thrust. I tried to relinquish the disturbance of redundant music played across the place but at last I lost to my idea of patience. Then I tried to look closely over this festival and they way it is organized among people. People gave identity to this festival.
First of all this festival was having a political motive to unite people at the time of fighting against British 'Raj' when it was started by Bal Gangadhar Tilak. This was an unique approach started and appriciated by then freedom fighters against the another approach proposed by Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi ( Mahatma Gandhi ) , The Salt Movement ( Namak Andolan and Dandi Yatra ). Both movement had deep impact over people of India at that time and both have mobilised people of different sect , with different cast and creed with the one aim of freedom from Raj.
Although Salt march was more globalised in terms of understanding, emotions and sensibility in comparision to Ganesh Puja, where it was more regional in terms of its understanding in terms of culture, language and identity.
Moreover, Ganesh Puja was the festival of Hindus where 'Salt March' was movement of a common man.

Now we are living in a free nation at least in some senses. We had recovered our freedom from the most aggressive race, which had discovered many nations, which had provided distinct learning processes, a race which is superior in many senses; from them we have snatched our freedom. We have sense of pride for our freedom. Pride which could be uncertain for certain masses, pride which could be politicized and religious in nature but modern India was founded on the grounds of political and social anarchy and conflicts of religious boundaries. In fact having such diversified history sometimes we are unite belligerently on chauvinistic and religious issues or some moments of celebrations like these festivals. But chronologically these moods of festival have been changed with respect to human sprit of celebration. Festivals have become the mode to target ‘Junta’ for money making on priority. There is a significant change happened in the modus operandi of organizing and carrying the festivals of these days. People used to drink liquor and other narcotic drugs which left them in pseudo-transcendental mood.

Indeed, the small community organizes their own Puja on such occasions and play musical bands with an unusual cacophony. And such strident and unwanted noise going to distract people always from such spiritual occasion of celebrations.

The mode of celebration has been politicized and contaminated with a mob-psychology where people gather just to mark there presence and hubris of pride that this time they have contributed from their side.

Ganesh Puja and Durga Puja where in the end of this festivals/puja; the statues of their idol have to be drowned in River or pond left some reasonable and hazardous environmental impact. I think, this has more discussion value rather than ‘Ram Sethu controversy points’ or any doomed subject discussion.

Although Ganesh Festival has been over and all Ganesh idols have sink in local ponds or adjoined Arabian Sea. But the concern over the integrity of such festivals in contemporary times where people are subjugated with fear of terror attacks on such occasion and leading the meaning of such festivals have been rises over the period of time. I’m not saying that we should not celebrate such festivals but society should take steps to prevent this cultural identity before it got wither away.

World From one eye

These days hotest news all arround is coming nuclear deal of India with US. Although deal has been quagmired in between left's(CPI(M) and company) attempt to get a stay over it and stewarding prime minister Manmohan Singh.
A deliberate attepmt has been made from congress side to get clear this deal from parliament atleast without knowing Junta's look over the nuclear deal.
PM is clear about the national benefit written in the name of congress by this nuclear deal or strategic deal per say by reminding his talks about integration plan for economic reform proposed in 1991. At that time he was critisized by many people of the house. He defended himself as steward of this whole nuclear deal with a vision of india getting into 21 centuary and also on to the track of global competetiveness.
I have some points to add on this burning issue.

Will this nuclear deal provide the enough energy resources and strategic development with US to India? Will such strategic tie up with US gonna affect India's relationship with China and Pakistan.

How many other levels of nuclear issues related with India's scientific research and development will be opened and closed by the time when we are going to make agrrements with IAEA and NSG.

This deal will create a big financial burden on India's soulders ( ~130 billion $). Does India ready for such investment while other challenges ( Agriculture, dying farmers in many regions in India, primary education , health care) are pending from last 60 years. There is a need to address the energy crisis in India as well but going for such support from US will disrupt India's grip over there own program of development of fossil fuels.
Such huge investment on other sectors like research and development could ensure better energy resources in near future.

If anguished left withdraw his support from government at this point of time, what will it cost to goverment and people? What would it cost to market? What would it cost to political arrangements during interregnum.

What is the possiblity of midterm polls and does government is ready for pay such a big price for deal to be accomplished.

If nuclear deal is accomplish successfully, how would the pros n cons use in next assempby election pending in 2009.

Certainly left is carrying his anti-US ideology in ruling states of Westbangal and Kerela. So definitly they will raise point against the Congress's dreams of shaking hands with US. But certailny CPI(M) cannot drag India into a bad situation of poor governement by commenting "Sarkaar to Aaati hai, Saarkaar to Jaati hai" ( Government come and go, CPI(M)top leader comment recently) Although lot of thinking is required before letting India to struck into any labyrinth of political,social and economical subjects.

Imbecile Painting Mood

My First Experiment with colors.

In-nocent Tasleema

Babri Masjid demolition became the reason for many quirks in social life of people specific to Hindu and Muslim religion. India was burning in flames of communalism, barbarism and innocent lives were living on the verge of high level of insecurity, curfew, police exploitation and community fear. People of both the religion were cursing each other and secretly there were parallel worlds from politics and criminals who were engaged in doing best to their thoughts. State security measures tantalize and incidence of Babri demolition and Bombay riots gave an identity to India on global scale of terrorism activated region. When these activities were affecting internal parts of India on various scales, other part of criminalization and demolition were happening in Bangladesh, India’s neighbor country. During those periods of riots in Bangladesh, Tasleema came in picture and write actively about riot cases and property; life vanished in Bangladesh during riots. She forms all his thoughts in form of one book ‘Lajja’. The content of book agonized her critique sitting on political chairs and religious fundamentalists groups, who releases fatwa against her to kill her. [As for Salman Rushdie]
That fatwa forces her to leave her country and she absconded to seek loyalist rehabilitation from Indian government and her people. Although thousands of Bangladeshis migrate to India legally or illegally but this time the migration of a writer was different because such migration was protested by Indian counterpart of religious fundamentalists and their leaders. But some how she managed to have a safe (unsafe) place for her being India as a mediocre.
The reason for writing this article was a recent attack made by a mob of ~30 MLAs and localites from Hyderabad to controversial writer, Tasleema, while she was visiting a conference to release her book. A lady (women) was brutally attacked by goons and gundas in front of media and people, breaking all the law and order by stating that Tasleema and her thoughts are harmful for Muslim community and people. Logically and legally no buddy can attack on a public meeting where thoughts and ideas have to share in context of removing religious ills and describing the outfits of any religion. In fact we are living in a society where we have rights to share information, rights to express and live. What could be the consequences of ideas formed by Tasleema Nasreen for a particular society of people irrespective of person who belongs to a particular community?
This is the personnel guilt of fundamentalist and extremists who think that such an idea of having religious amelioration lead by a woman who is certainly a bit controversial and bit foreign to us and our society is provoking their religion for any kind of wrong doing and wrong reason. Up to an extent Tasleema has written about restrictions imposed by Islam on women, women outcry in her community, atrocities, exploitation, terror surmounted on women, women empowerment and revival of male psychology relating to relationship with female. And she is not the only one who is writing about these entire topics and expressing a general concern over such areas but there are many activists working in these areas. Then why she is been beaten by Chappals in Hyderabad. Who has relegated these MLAs and Gundas to adhere such steps in day light breaking all legal and constitutional rights?
And question remains the same, who is responsible for this? Tasleema or We?

Why do we conclude in the end?

With most of the articles, news, essays, books it is obvious to find the conclusion part in the end. Because, it is believed to be in a particular format for better understanding of text or our narration of context rather than following a complex or unsystematic way of explaining something assuming human intellect has not conspicuous boundaries. In cultural context sometimes it is meaningless to subjugate self imagination and creativity for driving a better product or media to explain our stance in global social life. It is not a problem but it is ‘formatism’ in which we have started believing from some time. And we have become true follower of this formatism that we fear to question some of the rudimentary ideas of thinking most of the times. Moreover I would say that to overcome such formatism looks out of our pragmatic way of giving reason and solution because now such formatism is promoted by global market, global need and inter-society agreements on which cultural transactions made possible. There are increased chances of conflicts as well.
We fear of god whom we don’t know. We have just an idea given to us by scientific linguistics that how these powers operate. But again it is a mystery by now.

Dilli Darbaar

Context of finding this topic is present party political chaos in President Election this time after 1947. Election was glamorized, politicized by media and its inhabitants and later handed over to political parties for dubious foreplay of honorable presidency election. Candidature was quite obvious this time but the representation of both of the candidates was so rough that it is showing the manipulated character of typical Indian politician. Previously Kalam was undisputedly chosen by both parliamentary houses, albeit his clear image was not the choosing criteria on first hand but it was makeover time for NDA government and their image which were they carried from ‘Babri maszid’ demolition case and finally Kalam raise above the tower of Babel (The Indian Parliament).
The amendments to the psychology of common people by media were having enough gravity to influence people of home town of Mrs. Patil, which create a reason to celebrate while knowing the political inertness of Mrs. Patil in comparison to her competitor Mr. Shekhawat. Best part of this show was created by media people in terms of creating an awareness to country’s president and of course his/her involvement in political corruptness and nepotism favored by each candidate in their political career up to some extant.
This was the first time when each party was quibbling over support to their candidate while they forget to keep the sovereignty of both houses and political rituals. Congress is playing cards to deploy puppets on the driving seat and NDA is busy in opposing UPA's choice to play a level making opposition. And others and media is pulling legs of each other and representing there ownself as bulletdodger. But certainly congress can use this support to Mrs. Partil as a support to women empowerment in India and can install this as a product to woo votes in next general elections. But running all these threads from so long there is a need to scrutinize our political system and its sub systems of democracy in terms of a linkage between its peripheral body of people and their culture and other influent media.Otherwise it could be end up in a quagmire or deadlock situation between democratic parties and bureaucratic system and of course ‘Junta’ while Mrs. Patil has taken oath as India's 13th and first woman president.