Why do we conclude in the end?

With most of the articles, news, essays, books it is obvious to find the conclusion part in the end. Because, it is believed to be in a particular format for better understanding of text or our narration of context rather than following a complex or unsystematic way of explaining something assuming human intellect has not conspicuous boundaries. In cultural context sometimes it is meaningless to subjugate self imagination and creativity for driving a better product or media to explain our stance in global social life. It is not a problem but it is ‘formatism’ in which we have started believing from some time. And we have become true follower of this formatism that we fear to question some of the rudimentary ideas of thinking most of the times. Moreover I would say that to overcome such formatism looks out of our pragmatic way of giving reason and solution because now such formatism is promoted by global market, global need and inter-society agreements on which cultural transactions made possible. There are increased chances of conflicts as well.
We fear of god whom we don’t know. We have just an idea given to us by scientific linguistics that how these powers operate. But again it is a mystery by now.